The Observer has a piece about happiness. In it someone speaks about thre approaches to life – the pleasant life, the good life and the meaningful life. Here’s a quote:
But the most underrated of all, says Seligman, is the meaningful life – devoting oneself to an institution or cause greater than oneself. In a now classic exercise Seligman calls ‘Philanthropy versus Fun’, psychology students in one of his classes undertook to engage in one pleasurable activity and one philanthropic activity, and write about both. The results, he claims, were ‘life changing’. The afterglow of the fun activity (watching a film, eating ice cream) paled in comparison with the effects of the kind action (volunteering at a soup kitchen, helping at the school fair). The reason, Seligman suggests, is that kindness is a gratification. ‘It calls on your strengths to rise to an occasion and meet a challenge. Kindness is not accompanied by a separate stream of positive emotion, like joy; rather, it consists in [sic] total engagement and in the loss of self-consciousness.’
link via worthwhile…
reminds me of Phoebi’s line in Friends where she convinces the others that there is no self-less act because even if you do something good for someone it makes you feel good.
I found something similar a while back:
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/02/17/1076779970333.html
I blogged about it here:
http://cgi.timandkathy.co.uk/blog/archives/faith/possessions_happiness.php
I think more and more people out there in the wider community are starting to realise that there’s more to life than buying stuff.